| Welcome to bcfcforum.co.uk. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| A ? To The Folks Who Want Bruce To Stay; As our esteemed manager. | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: May 10 2006, 05:51 PM (391 Views) | |
| Hooby Groovy | May 11 2006, 08:41 AM Post #26 |
|
Frank Worthington
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Oh Wisel, the "my name is Steve" thing is clearly (and I mean clearly) a spoof Its like any parody, meant to be taken light hearted, which the sensible people on this board realise, no-one is taking it as verbatim - except you with your ludicrous campaign to make anyone that posts anything critical of Steve Bruce out as some sort of despot However, like any pardody, it is the element of truth within it that makes it amusing |
![]() |
|
| Wisel | May 11 2006, 08:42 AM Post #27 |
|
Unregistered
|
Partisan, read it again. The attack came from others attacking the anti Bruce position. I know you don't see it that way, but that's part of the same problem. |
|
|
| bornblues64 | May 11 2006, 08:44 AM Post #28 |
|
Mikael Forssell
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Regarding the long winded statement about Bruce the point "Pandiani arrived unfit" I remember Bruce saying "he has come back raring to go and is fit as a butchers dog" Its nice to see a thread like that but we all know you can turn anything round with words. The FACT is we are down and you dont need more reason than almost 2 years of c**p football and steady decline to want rid of a manager, personally i often think that Steve Bruces mum is writing some of these threads! :P |
![]() |
|
| PartisanBCFC | May 11 2006, 08:47 AM Post #29 |
![]()
Jack Wiseman
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Wisel..........It was pure 'wind up' Lighten up mate or you'll be gettin' more white hairs on your head than Gosforth's One and Only Prodigal Son I am out of here ......honest |
![]() |
|
| hughesie | May 11 2006, 08:49 AM Post #30 |
|
Ian Bennett
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
both sides of the argument have tunnel vision, the difference now wisel is that when people like myself were questioning bruce 12 months ago we were in the minority, but every argument that we got thrown at us we looked to offer constructive arguments as to why he should go, or at least offer options to what he should do. now both groups are pretty even now, with the pro bruce lobby now in the minority. both groups are resorting to petty squabbling to say they are right than just give the reasons again for why they support there man. it is for this reason that many myslef included have forgotten the true reasons for why some feel bruce should stay. the anti bruce say that you all want bruce to stay because he is a nice guy or what he did before. they do this partly to wind you up, and partly because all that happens is the pro bruce lobby just turn on the poster and say why should i give my reasons etc etc etc rather than say that is not the reason but this is........... |
![]() |
|
| PeteBaldwin | May 11 2006, 08:53 AM Post #31 |
|
Unregistered
|
Obviously this is from the opposite angle but looking at that, there's some huge holes there mate..... "I was told I had to sell players in the summer to finance the signings and hence had to start the season with three strikers." :blink: Why? No-one has only 3 strikers! He should have argued with the board and demanded another striker! "I tried to get in lots of left backs but with the money available felt I could not get anyone better than the likes of Clapham." Really?? No-one better than Clapham!? Who has now been released for free...... "I was happy with the right back because Mario had such a good season last time out the fans called him Super Mario, but unfortunately he has had a lot of injuries this term that have affected his form. " Fair enough but there's no proof of that - he could have just lost Mario's respect. "I had hardly any resources in Jan 06 to strengthen the squad but did manage to get a promising centre half on loan that I thought would provide good cover. " Again should have made more of a fuss about it to the board and come out in the press complaining to get what is best for the team instead of keeping good relations. "We lost twice to the vile despite our best efforts." That's just not true.... our best efforts!? Oh dear... "The loss of our creative midfield players to injury has meant that we have not turned our possession into chances. (and all the other injury/fitness related ones)" KK has said today that preparation was terrible for games. Also he said that you dont focus on treating injuries, you stop them from happening which we clearly did NOTHING about! "The players have never turned against me despite being extremely upset with the attitude of certain board members towards them. " Appart from KK, the ones who refused to play and others who have clearly not been bothered all season.... "Injuries have been terrible and despite looking for reasons for 18 months nobody can point the finger at anything that is wrong." Read the interview with KK.... the finger has most certainly been pointed! |
|
|
| Wisel | May 11 2006, 08:54 AM Post #32 |
|
Unregistered
|
Hooby Groovy. How about dealing with the issue at hand rather than your imaginary position. The anti lbby just keep perpetuating the disrespectful position. What would you suggest I do if I don't like that. I guess you would just ask me to put up with it eh? Well, uncoimfortable as it might be for some of these folk, I am not likely to do that. Now answer these seriously if you can do that. How many pro Bruce lobbyist do you hear saying 'the anti Bruce folk don't have any real reasons for their view'. How many do you hear saying 'There only three anti Bruce people any way'. How many. Should we respect other views on here, or is it that we only respect others views if they are part of our clique, or if they agree with us? |
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Blues Chat · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2




![]](http://z4.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)




2:29 PM Jul 11