Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to bcfcforum.co.uk. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Forest Fail With Danns Bid
Topic Started: Mar 6 2007, 11:37 PM (664 Views)
proccy_blues
Joe Bradford
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Bluebird
Mar 7 2007, 06:50 PM
Quote:
 
proccysotv Posted: Mar 7 2007, 07:33 AM 
Quote:
 
QUOTE (CarrotBlu @ Mar 7 2007, 07:32 AM)

It never says that Bruce was prepared to let him go. 

Stop crowing about nothing. 

don't worry, it just gives the anti sb mob a chance to again invade a thread with their vitriol...

I'm surprised at you proccy ~ that's a cheap shot!

sorry bluebird, was meant tongue in cheek - i forgot the smilie!! i agree you (a nd all of us) are entitled to opinions and even agree with most of them.... :o
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Bluebird
Paul Tait
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Quote:
 
proccysotv Posted on Mar 8 2007, 07:45 AM

sorry bluebird, was meant tongue in cheek - i forgot the smilie!! i agree you (a nd all of us) are entitled to opinions and even agree with most of them.... :o

I'm all emotional now....
I've even got a tear running down my leg :whistle:
And I am shocked :o that you agree with most of them too!
What the hell is going on here :unsure:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
proccy_blues
Joe Bradford
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Bluebird
Mar 8 2007, 10:14 AM
Quote:
 
proccysotv Posted on Mar 8 2007, 07:45 AM

sorry bluebird, was meant tongue in cheek - i forgot the smilie!! i agree you (a nd all of us) are entitled to opinions and even agree with most of them.... :o

I'm all emotional now....
I've even got a tear running down my leg :whistle:
And I am shocked :o that you agree with most of them too!
What the hell is going on here :unsure:

ooops, wrong smilie...
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
jassyblue80
Member Avatar
Trevor Francis
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
franscar
Mar 8 2007, 01:37 AM
After watching a bit of Danns last season, he played basically as an attacking midfielder. He had no defensive responsibilities whatsoever allowing him the freedom to make those charges into the box that brought him so many goals.

He isn't a smart enough player yet to realise when he can and can't go for said runs, whilst Clemence is, and he lacks the engine of Muamba to be able to get himself back into position if it all goes wrong. Hence why Bruce has tried to use him more often out wide, where it isn't so critical an area if he is caught out of position.

As he's only 24, it's plenty of time for him to learn the manner in which Bruce wants him to play, which is simply to be more disciplined, and he's still a good option to have to come off the bench when chasing a game because he has that ability to be in the right place to nick a goal.

exactly :applause:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Bluebird
Paul Tait
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Quote:
 
franscar Posted on Mar 8 2007, 01:37 AM

and he's still a good option to have to come off the bench when chasing a game because he has that ability to be in the right place to nick a goal

I agree that he's still a good option to come off the Bench....
But if Danns is our Bench option why is Brucie considering selling Danns and keeping Kilkenny?
Surely out of the two (and I am a Kilkenny fan) he should be selling Kilkenny shouldn't he?
Or have I lost my sense of logic here?

Oh! And how do we know that Kilkenny is too lightweight for this Division?
When have we ever seen him play for any period of time?
Does everyone honestly think that you can spend three months without a first team game and then walk onto the pitch and play at 100%?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
jassyblue80
Member Avatar
Trevor Francis
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Bluebird
Mar 8 2007, 10:40 AM
Quote:
 
franscar Posted on Mar 8 2007, 01:37 AM

and he's still a good option to have to come off the bench when chasing a game because he has that ability to be in the right place to nick a goal

I agree that he's still a good option to come off the Bench....
But if Danns is our Bench option why is Brucie considering selling Danns and keeping Kilkenny?
Surely out of the two (and I am a Kilkenny fan) he should be selling Kilkenny shouldn't he?
Or have I lost my sense of logic here?

where is it stated that he is considering selling either of them?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
doc nick
Malcom Page
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
jassyblue80
Mar 8 2007, 10:50 AM
Bluebird
Mar 8 2007, 10:40 AM
Quote:
 
franscar Posted on Mar 8 2007, 01:37 AM

and he's still a good option to have to come off the bench when chasing a game because he has that ability to be in the right place to nick a goal

I agree that he's still a good option to come off the Bench....
But if Danns is our Bench option why is Brucie considering selling Danns and keeping Kilkenny?
Surely out of the two (and I am a Kilkenny fan) he should be selling Kilkenny shouldn't he?
Or have I lost my sense of logic here?

where is it stated that he is considering selling either of them?

for danns to have said no he must of been asked if he wants to go.

on that bacis we can only asume that he is not wanted.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
jassyblue80
Member Avatar
Trevor Francis
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
doc nick
Mar 8 2007, 10:55 AM
jassyblue80
Mar 8 2007, 10:50 AM
Bluebird
Mar 8 2007, 10:40 AM
Quote:
 
franscar Posted on Mar 8 2007, 01:37 AM

and he's still a good option to have to come off the bench when chasing a game because he has that ability to be in the right place to nick a goal

I agree that he's still a good option to come off the Bench....
But if Danns is our Bench option why is Brucie considering selling Danns and keeping Kilkenny?
Surely out of the two (and I am a Kilkenny fan) he should be selling Kilkenny shouldn't he?
Or have I lost my sense of logic here?

where is it stated that he is considering selling either of them?

for danns to have said no he must of been asked if he wants to go.

on that bacis we can only asume that he is not wanted.

I think the manager has to let players no when a loan enquiry comes in... and it was just that a loan... we were not looking at selling as we can not at this stage of the season?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
franscar
Member Avatar
Mikael Forssell
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Maybe Bruce felt that by loaning him out for a month it would improve his confidence, and give him all important match fitness so that he'd be in the right shape and frame of mind to come into the side should Clemence or Muamba or Larsson go down with injury in the last few matches.

Maybe Danns felt he could retain his sharpness without having to leave the squad and go elsewhere.

Maybe Bruce had a chat with Colin Calderwood, mentioned it to Danns as a courtesy, and Danns said nah.

All sorts of variables.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Bookemdanno
Member Avatar
Alex Govan
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
You think too much!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Sameth
Frank Worthington
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
I think the move would have been good for Danns personally. He hasn't really shown what all the Colchester fans believe he can do. I suppose that could be linked with not having a long run in the team.

Interesting to see what his next sky sports column is.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Runningman
Member Avatar
Paul Tait
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Sameth
Mar 8 2007, 01:53 PM
I think the move would have been good for Danns personally. He hasn't really shown what all the Colchester fans believe he can do. I suppose that could be linked with not having a long run in the team.

Interesting to see what his next sky sports column is.

Remember, those things that Colchester fans thinks he can do, were being done in League 1 last season!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
doc nick
Malcom Page
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
jassyblue80
Mar 8 2007, 11:10 AM
doc nick
Mar 8 2007, 10:55 AM
jassyblue80
Mar 8 2007, 10:50 AM
Bluebird
Mar 8 2007, 10:40 AM
Quote:
 
franscar Posted on Mar 8 2007, 01:37 AM

and he's still a good option to have to come off the bench when chasing a game because he has that ability to be in the right place to nick a goal

I agree that he's still a good option to come off the Bench....
But if Danns is our Bench option why is Brucie considering selling Danns and keeping Kilkenny?
Surely out of the two (and I am a Kilkenny fan) he should be selling Kilkenny shouldn't he?
Or have I lost my sense of logic here?

where is it stated that he is considering selling either of them?

for danns to have said no he must of been asked if he wants to go.

on that bacis we can only asume that he is not wanted.

I think the manager has to let players no when a loan enquiry comes in... and it was just that a loan... we were not looking at selling as we can not at this stage of the season?

i know it was a loan mate.

but the princibles the same, if he wanted him to stay then surly he would have said no and that none of his players would be let go out on loan.

the point people are making is he must have been asked if he wanted to go out on loan.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
jmsblues
Member Avatar
Mikael Forssell
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Maybe SB wanted to loan him out because danns isn't getting any games, & he can do that at forest get a bit of a rhythem then if we get an injury to clem or muamba he can call him back & he'll be more match fit & maybe not as sluggish!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Bluebird
Paul Tait
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Quote:
 
jmsblues Posted on Mar 8 2007, 03:00 PM
Maybe SB wanted to loan him out because danns isn't getting any games, & he can do that at forest get a bit of a rhythem then if we get an injury to clem or muamba he can call him back & he'll be more match fit & maybe not as sluggish!

Agreed....
But if Danns is in "The Squad" why not loan out Kilkenny.....
And (even though I know this is a bit extreme for Blues at the moment) why not play all the unused Squad and fringe players in the reserves each week to keep them sharp and up to match fitness?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Blues Chat · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Forum Design by Hirsty.