|
Beye £1.8m
|
|
Topic Started: Jan 22 2010, 07:21 AM (674 Views)
|
|
qwerty83
|
Jan 22 2010, 07:21 AM
Post #1
|
- Posts:
- 826
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #1,038
- Joined:
- June 10, 2005
|
Just on SSn we have bid £1.8 m for Villa defender - any other thoughts anyone.
Tattum seems to have missed this if true.
|
|
|
| |
|
BornBlueDieBlue
|
Jan 22 2010, 07:27 AM
Post #2
|
- Posts:
- 1,196
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #5,080
- Joined:
- May 29, 2006
|
he's off to blunderland, sky have made a mistake
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/...e.html?ITO=1490
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport...S&ATTR=Football
|
|
|
| |
|
PartisanBCFC
|
Jan 22 2010, 07:31 AM
Post #3
|
- Posts:
- 35,472
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #980
- Joined:
- February 5, 2005
|
- qwerty83
- Jan 22 2010, 03:21 AM
Just on SSn we have bid £1.8 m for Villa defender - any other thoughts anyone.
Tattum seems to have missed this if true.
Yes, I heard that too
Got to be a misatke
Steve Bruce is after him at Sunderland
We have Stephen Carr anyway
|
|
|
| |
|
adblues4life
|
Jan 22 2010, 11:56 AM
Post #4
|
- Posts:
- 962
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #5,837
- Joined:
- September 3, 2006
|
no way are we just trying to buy ex vile players. I understand gardner cause hes a brummie and young and can fill in at right back as well as midfield. Please no more vile players thanks
dont need a right back or left back until the summer. Then we could buy quality full backs
|
|
|
| |
|
SuttonBluenose
|
Jan 22 2010, 12:29 PM
Post #5
|
- Posts:
- 1,422
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #15,904
- Joined:
- January 25, 2009
|
he's not bad though lad's, we'd only have him as a back up for ridgy, and the deal looks pretty accurate.
|
|
|
| |
|
bluenose52
|
Jan 22 2010, 12:35 PM
Post #6
|
- Posts:
- 550
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #17,744
- Joined:
- August 13, 2009
|
You being a expert on the Vile would know , wound'nt ya
|
|
|
| |
|
MikaelForssell
|
Jan 22 2010, 12:39 PM
Post #7
|
- Posts:
- 17,200
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #1,031
- Joined:
- June 10, 2005
|
- SuttonBluenose
- Jan 22 2010, 12:29 PM
he's not bad though lad's, we'd only have him as a back up for ridgy, and the deal looks pretty accurate.
He's a right back.... not left back, we do need a back up right back with Parnaby's injury record... but not Beye thanks.
|
|
|
| |
|
SuttonBluenose
|
Jan 22 2010, 12:40 PM
Post #8
|
- Posts:
- 1,422
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #15,904
- Joined:
- January 25, 2009
|
- MikaelForssell
- Jan 22 2010, 12:39 PM
- SuttonBluenose
- Jan 22 2010, 12:29 PM
he's not bad though lad's, we'd only have him as a back up for ridgy, and the deal looks pretty accurate.
He's a right back.... not left back, we do need a back up right back with Parnaby's injury record... but not Beye thanks.
ridgy's a cb, not a lb, so it doesnt matter
|
|
|
| |
|
MikaelForssell
|
Jan 22 2010, 12:44 PM
Post #9
|
- Posts:
- 17,200
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #1,031
- Joined:
- June 10, 2005
|
- SuttonBluenose
- Jan 22 2010, 12:40 PM
- MikaelForssell
- Jan 22 2010, 12:39 PM
- SuttonBluenose
- Jan 22 2010, 12:29 PM
he's not bad though lad's, we'd only have him as a back up for ridgy, and the deal looks pretty accurate.
He's a right back.... not left back, we do need a back up right back with Parnaby's injury record... but not Beye thanks.
ridgy's a cb, not a lb, so it doesnt matter
He's left footed. And is doing an adequate job there.
Beye's right footed and therefore brings a problem with balance into the defence... we saw that earlier in the season when Carr had to play left back.
So yeah it does matter.
|
|
|
| |
|
wardendbluenose
|
Jan 22 2010, 01:09 PM
Post #10
|
- Posts:
- 4,715
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #864
- Joined:
- February 3, 2005
|
According to some v***a supporting friends O'Neill is the greatest manager ever (for the moment) how many players has he bought in and soon shipped out after? He must have replaced the whole back line 3 times since he has been there.
|
|
|
| |
|
SuttonBluenose
|
Jan 23 2010, 02:23 AM
Post #11
|
- Posts:
- 1,422
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #15,904
- Joined:
- January 25, 2009
|
- MikaelForssell
- Jan 22 2010, 12:44 PM
- SuttonBluenose
- Jan 22 2010, 12:40 PM
- MikaelForssell
- Jan 22 2010, 12:39 PM
- SuttonBluenose
- Jan 22 2010, 12:29 PM
he's not bad though lad's, we'd only have him as a back up for ridgy, and the deal looks pretty accurate.
He's a right back.... not left back, we do need a back up right back with Parnaby's injury record... but not Beye thanks.
ridgy's a cb, not a lb, so it doesnt matter
He's left footed. And is doing an adequate job there. Beye's right footed and therefore brings a problem with balance into the defence... we saw that earlier in the season when Carr had to play left back. So yeah it does matter.
it really doesnt matter what foot you use,
It's just for a bit of dynamism.
I play lm for my local club, and i'm right footed, it doesnt matter. whatever foot u kick with, you can still get the ball in the right area, but with different angles on the ball.(spin+curve)
A lot of the lb's we have had in the past have been right footed, so no, it doesnt matter, as they have coped pretty well
|
|
|
| |
|
MikaelForssell
|
Jan 23 2010, 02:31 AM
Post #12
|
- Posts:
- 17,200
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #1,031
- Joined:
- June 10, 2005
|
- SuttonBluenose
- Jan 23 2010, 02:23 AM
- MikaelForssell
- Jan 22 2010, 12:44 PM
- SuttonBluenose
- Jan 22 2010, 12:40 PM
- MikaelForssell
- Jan 22 2010, 12:39 PM
- SuttonBluenose
- Jan 22 2010, 12:29 PM
he's not bad though lad's, we'd only have him as a back up for ridgy, and the deal looks pretty accurate.
He's a right back.... not left back, we do need a back up right back with Parnaby's injury record... but not Beye thanks.
ridgy's a cb, not a lb, so it doesnt matter
He's left footed. And is doing an adequate job there. Beye's right footed and therefore brings a problem with balance into the defence... we saw that earlier in the season when Carr had to play left back. So yeah it does matter.
it really doesnt matter what foot you use, It's just for a bit of dynamism. I play lm for my local club, and i'm right footed, it doesnt matter. whatever foot u kick with, you can still get the ball in the right area, but with different angles on the ball.(spin+curve) A lot of the lb's we have had in the past have been right footed, so no, it doesnt matter, as they have coped pretty well
Because a big part of our defensive record is having a balanced back four, and one that are used to each other.
You play a right footer at left back, and the balance goes defensively, not offensively... it means that the wrong footer will end up showing the opposition lad inside alot as he's more comfortable on his right, meaning more danger.
|
|
|
| |
|
jmsblues
|
Jan 23 2010, 01:34 PM
Post #13
|
- Posts:
- 5,089
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #206
- Joined:
- August 16, 2004
|
- MikaelForssell
- Jan 23 2010, 02:31 AM
- SuttonBluenose
- Jan 23 2010, 02:23 AM
- MikaelForssell
- Jan 22 2010, 12:44 PM
- SuttonBluenose
- Jan 22 2010, 12:40 PM
- MikaelForssell
- Jan 22 2010, 12:39 PM
- SuttonBluenose
- Jan 22 2010, 12:29 PM
he's not bad though lad's, we'd only have him as a back up for ridgy, and the deal looks pretty accurate.
He's a right back.... not left back, we do need a back up right back with Parnaby's injury record... but not Beye thanks.
ridgy's a cb, not a lb, so it doesnt matter
He's left footed. And is doing an adequate job there. Beye's right footed and therefore brings a problem with balance into the defence... we saw that earlier in the season when Carr had to play left back. So yeah it does matter.
it really doesnt matter what foot you use, It's just for a bit of dynamism. I play lm for my local club, and i'm right footed, it doesnt matter. whatever foot u kick with, you can still get the ball in the right area, but with different angles on the ball.(spin+curve) A lot of the lb's we have had in the past have been right footed, so no, it doesnt matter, as they have coped pretty well
Because a big part of our defensive record is having a balanced back four, and one that are used to each other. You play a right footer at full back, and the balance goes defensively, not offensively... it means that the wrong footer will end up showing the opposition lad inside alot as he's more comfortable on his right, meaning more danger.
obviously it would be an advantage being left footed at left back :drink:
|
|
|
| |
|
BrummieBear
|
Jan 23 2010, 04:03 PM
Post #14
|
- Posts:
- 3,475
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #17,205
- Joined:
- June 15, 2009
|
- MikaelForssell
- Jan 23 2010, 02:31 AM
- SuttonBluenose
- Jan 23 2010, 02:23 AM
- MikaelForssell
- Jan 22 2010, 12:44 PM
- SuttonBluenose
- Jan 22 2010, 12:40 PM
- MikaelForssell
- Jan 22 2010, 12:39 PM
- SuttonBluenose
- Jan 22 2010, 12:29 PM
he's not bad though lad's, we'd only have him as a back up for ridgy, and the deal looks pretty accurate.
He's a right back.... not left back, we do need a back up right back with Parnaby's injury record... but not Beye thanks.
ridgy's a cb, not a lb, so it doesnt matter
He's left footed. And is doing an adequate job there. Beye's right footed and therefore brings a problem with balance into the defence... we saw that earlier in the season when Carr had to play left back. So yeah it does matter.
it really doesnt matter what foot you use, It's just for a bit of dynamism. I play lm for my local club, and i'm right footed, it doesnt matter. whatever foot u kick with, you can still get the ball in the right area, but with different angles on the ball.(spin+curve) A lot of the lb's we have had in the past have been right footed, so no, it doesnt matter, as they have coped pretty well
Because a big part of our defensive record is having a balanced back four, and one that are used to each other. You play a right footer at left back, and the balance goes defensively, not offensively... it means that the wrong footer will end up showing the opposition lad inside alot as he's more comfortable on his right, meaning more danger.
Not true for everyone...
Genuinely yes but just because a player is right footed does not mean they can not be a good LB, some quality LB's in the past have been Right Footers.
But usually yeah your spot on. **thumbup
|
|
|
| |
|
MikaelForssell
|
Jan 23 2010, 06:18 PM
Post #15
|
- Posts:
- 17,200
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #1,031
- Joined:
- June 10, 2005
|
- BrummieBear
- Jan 23 2010, 04:03 PM
- MikaelForssell
- Jan 23 2010, 02:31 AM
- SuttonBluenose
- Jan 23 2010, 02:23 AM
- MikaelForssell
- Jan 22 2010, 12:44 PM
- SuttonBluenose
- Jan 22 2010, 12:40 PM
- MikaelForssell
- Jan 22 2010, 12:39 PM
- SuttonBluenose
- Jan 22 2010, 12:29 PM
he's not bad though lad's, we'd only have him as a back up for ridgy, and the deal looks pretty accurate.
He's a right back.... not left back, we do need a back up right back with Parnaby's injury record... but not Beye thanks.
ridgy's a cb, not a lb, so it doesnt matter
He's left footed. And is doing an adequate job there. Beye's right footed and therefore brings a problem with balance into the defence... we saw that earlier in the season when Carr had to play left back. So yeah it does matter.
it really doesnt matter what foot you use, It's just for a bit of dynamism. I play lm for my local club, and i'm right footed, it doesnt matter. whatever foot u kick with, you can still get the ball in the right area, but with different angles on the ball.(spin+curve) A lot of the lb's we have had in the past have been right footed, so no, it doesnt matter, as they have coped pretty well
Because a big part of our defensive record is having a balanced back four, and one that are used to each other. You play a right footer at left back, and the balance goes defensively, not offensively... it means that the wrong footer will end up showing the opposition lad inside alot as he's more comfortable on his right, meaning more danger.
Not true for everyone... Genuinely yes but just because a player is right footed does not mean they can not be a good LB, some quality LB's in the past have been Right Footers. But usually yeah your spot on. **thumbup
Im not saying 'every' player has to be left footed to be a successful left back... but theres always a imbalance at the back with a right footed left back.... Dennis Irwin was a right footed left back, and whilst he was a cracking player, no doubt about it... he was the weak link of the United back four as he wasnt able to show opposition wingers down the line, just inside.
However he worked on this over his career and improved on it, but, right now, with our solid defence, id like to keep a natural balance, as, as I mentioned above, when we had Carr at left back earlier in the season, we didnt look too solid and balanced at the back.
|
|
|
| |
|
SuttonBluenose
|
Jan 23 2010, 11:00 PM
Post #16
|
- Posts:
- 1,422
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #15,904
- Joined:
- January 25, 2009
|
- MikaelForssell
- Jan 23 2010, 06:18 PM
- BrummieBear
- Jan 23 2010, 04:03 PM
- MikaelForssell
- Jan 23 2010, 02:31 AM
- SuttonBluenose
- Jan 23 2010, 02:23 AM
- MikaelForssell
- Jan 22 2010, 12:44 PM
- SuttonBluenose
- Jan 22 2010, 12:40 PM
- MikaelForssell
- Jan 22 2010, 12:39 PM
- SuttonBluenose
- Jan 22 2010, 12:29 PM
he's not bad though lad's, we'd only have him as a back up for ridgy, and the deal looks pretty accurate.
He's a right back.... not left back, we do need a back up right back with Parnaby's injury record... but not Beye thanks.
ridgy's a cb, not a lb, so it doesnt matter
He's left footed. And is doing an adequate job there. Beye's right footed and therefore brings a problem with balance into the defence... we saw that earlier in the season when Carr had to play left back. So yeah it does matter.
it really doesnt matter what foot you use, It's just for a bit of dynamism. I play lm for my local club, and i'm right footed, it doesnt matter. whatever foot u kick with, you can still get the ball in the right area, but with different angles on the ball.(spin+curve) A lot of the lb's we have had in the past have been right footed, so no, it doesnt matter, as they have coped pretty well
Because a big part of our defensive record is having a balanced back four, and one that are used to each other. You play a right footer at left back, and the balance goes defensively, not offensively... it means that the wrong footer will end up showing the opposition lad inside alot as he's more comfortable on his right, meaning more danger.
Not true for everyone... Genuinely yes but just because a player is right footed does not mean they can not be a good LB, some quality LB's in the past have been Right Footers. But usually yeah your spot on. **thumbup
Im not saying 'every' player has to be left footed to be a successful left back... but theres always a imbalance at the back with a right footed left back.... Dennis Irwin was a right footed left back, and whilst he was a cracking player, no doubt about it... he was the weak link of the United back four as he wasnt able to show opposition wingers down the line, just inside. However he worked on this over his career and improved on it, but, right now, with our solid defence, id like to keep a natural balance, as, as I mentioned above, when we had Carr at left back earlier in the season, we didnt look too solid and balanced at the back.
sure sure, sorry, i thought you meant most lb's
after seeing ridgy's perfromance today, i dont think we need beye at all.-he would only be as back up, and behind him we have murphy and vignal.
|
|
|
| |
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
|