|
Blues Vs Mallorca
|
|
Topic Started: Aug 7 2010, 01:40 PM (4,357 Views)
|
|
dublinbrummie
|
Aug 7 2010, 04:03 PM
Post #176
|
- Posts:
- 918
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #36
- Joined:
- August 15, 2004
|
you dont really know if a game is on till its on anyway
|
|
|
| |
|
Blooboy
|
Aug 7 2010, 04:04 PM
Post #177
|
|
Unregistered
|
- Blue Raphealite
- Aug 7 2010, 05:01 PM
- Blooboy
- Aug 7 2010, 04:59 PM
- Blue Raphealite
- Aug 7 2010, 04:49 PM
- dublinbrummie
- Aug 7 2010, 04:43 PM
- Mr. Blue
- Aug 7 2010, 03:42 PM
How are you all watching this?
we cant say or we will be banned
What if you mentioned it next Tuesday afternoon in a thread about favourite sports or something? Do you still get banned if the match has long gone, but the site remains :D I read that recently but I don't think anyone answered it.
yes you would be, posting the link of any site that has shown or will show a Live Birmingham City match will leave your account suspended and your IP address banned completely from the forum, hope that answers your question
OI ! Bit of politeness mate. :kiss: It doesn't fully answer the question - what about PMs at about 3.00am next Tuesday morning. How you gonna know? That was the second half of the question no one answered. Now when you answer blooboy, can you retain some politeness mate? :kiss:
that was polite, i took the time to answer your question.
PM what you like in your messages.
it's the posting on the forum thats banned, as explained in the rules
hope that answers your post. :kiss:
|
|
|
| |
|
Blue Raphealite
|
Aug 7 2010, 04:06 PM
Post #178
|
- Posts:
- 3,635
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #17,469
- Joined:
- July 16, 2009
|
**thumbup
:applause:
|
|
|
| |
|
terminator666
|
Aug 7 2010, 04:09 PM
Post #179
|
- Posts:
- 2,133
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #7,230
- Joined:
- March 27, 2007
|
I knew we would lose today-relegated by xmas then. < <
|
|
|
| |
|
Blooboy
|
Aug 7 2010, 04:11 PM
Post #180
|
|
Unregistered
|
- terminator666
- Aug 7 2010, 05:09 PM
I knew we would lose today-relegated by xmas then. < <
:LOL: lets take the Villa with us
|
|
|
| |
|
Bluebird
|
Aug 7 2010, 04:12 PM
Post #181
|
- Posts:
- 3,020
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #106
- Joined:
- August 15, 2004
|
- Quote:
-
Blooboy Posted on Aug 7 2010, 05:04 PM that was polite, i took the time to answer your question.
PM what you like in your messages.
it's the posting on the forum thats banned, as explained in the rules
hope that answers your post
In the past I have received a link in a PM and it was changed to the Blues Home Page :o It surprised me too! I thought all PM's were private! :break:
|
|
|
| |
|
Engleman
|
Aug 7 2010, 04:12 PM
Post #182
|
- Posts:
- 6,368
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #16,651
- Joined:
- April 3, 2009
|
- Blue Raphealite
- Aug 7 2010, 05:01 PM
- Blooboy
- Aug 7 2010, 04:59 PM
- Blue Raphealite
- Aug 7 2010, 04:49 PM
- dublinbrummie
- Aug 7 2010, 04:43 PM
- Mr. Blue
- Aug 7 2010, 03:42 PM
How are you all watching this?
we cant say or we will be banned
What if you mentioned it next Tuesday afternoon in a thread about favourite sports or something? Do you still get banned if the match has long gone, but the site remains :D I read that recently but I don't think anyone answered it.
yes you would be, posting the link of any site that has shown or will show a Live Birmingham City match will leave your account suspended and your IP address banned completely from the forum, hope that answers your question
OI ! Bit of politeness mate. :kiss: It doesn't fully answer the question - what about PMs at about 3.00am next Tuesday morning. How you gonna know? That was the second half of the question no one answered. Now when you answer blooboy, can you retain some politeness mate? :kiss:
HEY!
blooboy is being polite! he's trying to warn and cover the ars* of other members who shouldn't enquire for such links if they can't be bothered to get of their's to resource themselves! :ph43r:
|
|
|
| |
|
Blue Raphealite
|
Aug 7 2010, 04:17 PM
Post #183
|
- Posts:
- 3,635
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #17,469
- Joined:
- July 16, 2009
|
- engleman
- Aug 7 2010, 05:12 PM
HEY! blooboy is being polite! he's trying to warn and cover the ars* of other members who shouldn't enquire for such links if they can't be bothered to get of their's to resource themselves! :ph43r:
I'm only teasing him mate. :D
And do you always write in serbo-croat ?
:kiss:
|
|
|
| |
|
Willie
|
Aug 7 2010, 04:21 PM
Post #184
|
- Posts:
- 8,054
- Group:
- Revered Members
- Member
- #39
- Joined:
- August 15, 2004
|
- Bluebird
- Aug 7 2010, 05:12 PM
- Quote:
-
Blooboy Posted on Aug 7 2010, 05:04 PM that was polite, i took the time to answer your question.
PM what you like in your messages.
it's the posting on the forum thats banned, as explained in the rules
hope that answers your post
In the past I have received a link in a PM and it was changed to the Blues Home Page :o It surprised me too! I thought all PM's were private! :break:
Its witchcraft i tell you witchcraft.... :P
Bluebird Pm's are private no one but the people sending and recieving them can read them, but we do have people who recieve these kind of pms who report them to us. hence we know who is most likely to send them.........
|
|
|
| |
|
OllieBCFC
|
Aug 7 2010, 04:46 PM
Post #185
|
- Posts:
- 81
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #10,910
- Joined:
- May 14, 2008
|
Thought we played well today, result is irrelavent, win would've been a bonus but its all about fitness and allowing the manager to look at players, formations etc. For a game against very decent Spanish opposition I thought we kept the ball from them really well at times and we were extremely unlucky not to get at least one goal. Out of the new boys, Foster did well, didn't really have a chance with the goal, he made a few good saves and his catching of crosses and distribution was good. When Zigic came on we looked more of a threat up front and just his mere presence caused problems for their defence, his workrate also impressed me. I thought Valles was brilliant when he came on, looked so comfortable on the ball his first touch was good, and was unlucky not to score. McLeish says he is more of a signing for the future but I hope he plays some part this season.
|
|
|
| |
|
Raters
|
Aug 7 2010, 04:50 PM
Post #186
|
- Posts:
- 7,627
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #9,114
- Joined:
- November 6, 2007
|
- bluenosekev
- Aug 7 2010, 04:57 PM
Glad I never went and wasted my money..
Cant score goals as usual..
Normal service has been resumed..
Kro.
TBH I'm glad you wasn't there.
Although if you had of been you'd have seen us play well apart from a poor piece of defending. Also the goal was against the run of play. We were, for most of the game, the better team. Loads of chances including hitting the bar.
And dare i say it? plenty of passing moves, not all came off, but it was good to watch
BTW Anybody know how the ville got on last night??? :whistle:
|
|
|
| |
|
Raters
|
Aug 7 2010, 04:51 PM
Post #187
|
- Posts:
- 7,627
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #9,114
- Joined:
- November 6, 2007
|
- OllieBCFC
- Aug 7 2010, 05:46 PM
Thought we played well today, result is irrelavent, win would've been a bonus but its all about fitness and allowing the manager to look at players, formations etc. For a game against very decent Spanish opposition I thought we kept the ball from them really well at times and we were extremely unlucky not to get at least one goal. Out of the new boys, Foster did well, didn't really have a chance with the goal, he made a few good saves and his catching of crosses and distribution was good. When Zigic came on we looked more of a threat up front and just his mere presence caused problems for their defence, his workrate also impressed me. I thought Valles was brilliant when he came on, looked so comfortable on the ball his first touch was good, and was unlucky not to score. McLeish says he is more of a signing for the future but I hope he plays some part this season.
:applause:
|
|
|
| |
|
pooley
|
Aug 7 2010, 04:54 PM
Post #188
|
- Posts:
- 18,433
- Group:
- Admin
- Member
- #11,489
- Joined:
- July 1, 2008
|
- OllieBCFC
- Aug 7 2010, 04:46 PM
Thought we played well today, result is irrelavent, win would've been a bonus but its all about fitness and allowing the manager to look at players, formations etc. For a game against very decent Spanish opposition I thought we kept the ball from them really well at times and we were extremely unlucky not to get at least one goal. Out of the new boys, Foster did well, didn't really have a chance with the goal, he made a few good saves and his catching of crosses and distribution was good. When Zigic came on we looked more of a threat up front and just his mere presence caused problems for their defence, his workrate also impressed me. I thought Valles was brilliant when he came on, looked so comfortable on the ball his first touch was good, and was unlucky not to score. McLeish says he is more of a signing for the future but I hope he plays some part this season.
did goc feature much today? If so how did he do? Im hoping he will prove a lot of doubters wrong this season - also I have heard that murphy is like a new player and has looked fit and good going forward in pre season?
|
|
|
| |
|
Raters
|
Aug 7 2010, 04:55 PM
Post #189
|
- Posts:
- 7,627
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #9,114
- Joined:
- November 6, 2007
|
- pooley
- Aug 7 2010, 05:54 PM
- OllieBCFC
- Aug 7 2010, 04:46 PM
Thought we played well today, result is irrelavent, win would've been a bonus but its all about fitness and allowing the manager to look at players, formations etc. For a game against very decent Spanish opposition I thought we kept the ball from them really well at times and we were extremely unlucky not to get at least one goal. Out of the new boys, Foster did well, didn't really have a chance with the goal, he made a few good saves and his catching of crosses and distribution was good. When Zigic came on we looked more of a threat up front and just his mere presence caused problems for their defence, his workrate also impressed me. I thought Valles was brilliant when he came on, looked so comfortable on the ball his first touch was good, and was unlucky not to score. McLeish says he is more of a signing for the future but I hope he plays some part this season.
did goc feature much today? If so how did he do? Im hoping he will prove a lot of doubters wrong this season - also I have heard that murphy is like a new player and has looked fit and good going forward in pre season?
Both played well mate.
GOC looked strong, composed and his work rate was good. Murphy much the same. Both only played, at most, half the game. Seems to me we had subs every 5 mins lol
|
|
|
| |
|
MikaelForssell
|
Aug 7 2010, 04:59 PM
Post #190
|
- Posts:
- 17,200
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #1,031
- Joined:
- June 10, 2005
|
- engleman
- Aug 7 2010, 04:01 PM
This was the first real test IMO!
Gardner at RB forget about it we missed him in CM
Foster fluffed the goal as far as I'm concerned!
We're still mising that extra dimension, hopefully Dembelle and/or Camoranesi will provide it!
Our new formation is not found yet, we'll have to sort it early in the next campaign after the new boys join us!
KRO :Blues:
Gardner was decent at RB, but id put him in midfield every time... but he is more than adequate in an emergency.
Foster could do nothing about the goal, and had a very good game IMO.
**thumbup
|
|
|
| |
|
Raters
|
Aug 7 2010, 05:02 PM
Post #191
|
- Posts:
- 7,627
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #9,114
- Joined:
- November 6, 2007
|
- MikaelForssell
- Aug 7 2010, 05:59 PM
Foster could do nothing about the goal, and had a very good game IMO. **thumbup
:applause:
It was poor defending, not sure who should have been picking up the goal scorer but he was completly unmarked.
|
|
|
| |
|
pooley
|
Aug 7 2010, 05:02 PM
Post #192
|
- Posts:
- 18,433
- Group:
- Admin
- Member
- #11,489
- Joined:
- July 1, 2008
|
- Raters
- Aug 7 2010, 04:55 PM
- pooley
- Aug 7 2010, 05:54 PM
- OllieBCFC
- Aug 7 2010, 04:46 PM
Thought we played well today, result is irrelavent, win would've been a bonus but its all about fitness and allowing the manager to look at players, formations etc. For a game against very decent Spanish opposition I thought we kept the ball from them really well at times and we were extremely unlucky not to get at least one goal. Out of the new boys, Foster did well, didn't really have a chance with the goal, he made a few good saves and his catching of crosses and distribution was good. When Zigic came on we looked more of a threat up front and just his mere presence caused problems for their defence, his workrate also impressed me. I thought Valles was brilliant when he came on, looked so comfortable on the ball his first touch was good, and was unlucky not to score. McLeish says he is more of a signing for the future but I hope he plays some part this season.
did goc feature much today? If so how did he do? Im hoping he will prove a lot of doubters wrong this season - also I have heard that murphy is like a new player and has looked fit and good going forward in pre season?
Both played well mate. GOC looked strong, composed and his work rate was good. Murphy much the same. Both only played, at most, half the game. Seems to me we had subs every 5 mins lol
I didnt go to the game but seems to be the same people who critisised almost every aspect of the game.
The way you approach, look at and evaluate a pre season gamwe is completley different to a competative game and like I say I didnt watch the game but I think some comments were too harsh in their content.
The critisism of fahey is taking the michael now it seems, since sheffers left he seems to be our new scapegoat
|
|
|
| |
|
Raters
|
Aug 7 2010, 05:07 PM
Post #193
|
- Posts:
- 7,627
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #9,114
- Joined:
- November 6, 2007
|
- pooley
- Aug 7 2010, 06:02 PM
- Raters
- Aug 7 2010, 04:55 PM
- pooley
- Aug 7 2010, 05:54 PM
- OllieBCFC
- Aug 7 2010, 04:46 PM
Thought we played well today, result is irrelavent, win would've been a bonus but its all about fitness and allowing the manager to look at players, formations etc. For a game against very decent Spanish opposition I thought we kept the ball from them really well at times and we were extremely unlucky not to get at least one goal. Out of the new boys, Foster did well, didn't really have a chance with the goal, he made a few good saves and his catching of crosses and distribution was good. When Zigic came on we looked more of a threat up front and just his mere presence caused problems for their defence, his workrate also impressed me. I thought Valles was brilliant when he came on, looked so comfortable on the ball his first touch was good, and was unlucky not to score. McLeish says he is more of a signing for the future but I hope he plays some part this season.
did goc feature much today? If so how did he do? Im hoping he will prove a lot of doubters wrong this season - also I have heard that murphy is like a new player and has looked fit and good going forward in pre season?
Both played well mate. GOC looked strong, composed and his work rate was good. Murphy much the same. Both only played, at most, half the game. Seems to me we had subs every 5 mins lol
I didnt go to the game but seems to be the same people who critisised almost every aspect of the game. The way you approach, look at and evaluate a pre season gamwe is completley different to a competative game and like I say I didnt watch the game but I think some comments were too harsh in their content. The critisism of fahey is taking the michael now it seems, since sheffers left he seems to be our new scapegoat
TBH mate i could nit pick and it would be exactly that. e.g. Jeromes first touch and footie brain, still the same, but he made up for it in other ways.
Overall I came away thinking we gave them a good run, in fact we were unlucky. A good solid performance over all. Particularly when you realise we had practically the whole team subbed!
BTW Fahey had a good game!
|
|
|
| |
|
.Jake
|
Aug 7 2010, 05:08 PM
Post #194
|
- Posts:
- 7,583
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #10,001
- Joined:
- February 22, 2008
|
- Raters
- Aug 7 2010, 05:07 PM
- pooley
- Aug 7 2010, 06:02 PM
- Raters
- Aug 7 2010, 04:55 PM
- pooley
- Aug 7 2010, 05:54 PM
- OllieBCFC
- Aug 7 2010, 04:46 PM
Thought we played well today, result is irrelavent, win would've been a bonus but its all about fitness and allowing the manager to look at players, formations etc. For a game against very decent Spanish opposition I thought we kept the ball from them really well at times and we were extremely unlucky not to get at least one goal. Out of the new boys, Foster did well, didn't really have a chance with the goal, he made a few good saves and his catching of crosses and distribution was good. When Zigic came on we looked more of a threat up front and just his mere presence caused problems for their defence, his workrate also impressed me. I thought Valles was brilliant when he came on, looked so comfortable on the ball his first touch was good, and was unlucky not to score. McLeish says he is more of a signing for the future but I hope he plays some part this season.
did goc feature much today? If so how did he do? Im hoping he will prove a lot of doubters wrong this season - also I have heard that murphy is like a new player and has looked fit and good going forward in pre season?
Both played well mate. GOC looked strong, composed and his work rate was good. Murphy much the same. Both only played, at most, half the game. Seems to me we had subs every 5 mins lol
I didnt go to the game but seems to be the same people who critisised almost every aspect of the game. The way you approach, look at and evaluate a pre season gamwe is completley different to a competative game and like I say I didnt watch the game but I think some comments were too harsh in their content. The critisism of fahey is taking the michael now it seems, since sheffers left he seems to be our new scapegoat
TBH mate i could nit pick and it would be exactly that. e.g. Jeromes first touch and footie brain, still the same, but he made up for it in other ways. Overall I came away thinking we gave them a good run, in fact we were unlucky. A good solid performance over all. Particularly when you realise we had practically the whole team subbed! BTW Fahey had a good game!
i thought jeromes ball control was good today - i only saw the 2nd half though
|
|
|
| |
|
salad_dodger
|
Aug 7 2010, 05:08 PM
Post #195
|
- Posts:
- 3,765
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #59
- Joined:
- August 15, 2004
|
- pooley
- Aug 7 2010, 04:54 PM
- OllieBCFC
- Aug 7 2010, 04:46 PM
Thought we played well today, result is irrelavent, win would've been a bonus but its all about fitness and allowing the manager to look at players, formations etc. For a game against very decent Spanish opposition I thought we kept the ball from them really well at times and we were extremely unlucky not to get at least one goal. Out of the new boys, Foster did well, didn't really have a chance with the goal, he made a few good saves and his catching of crosses and distribution was good. When Zigic came on we looked more of a threat up front and just his mere presence caused problems for their defence, his workrate also impressed me. I thought Valles was brilliant when he came on, looked so comfortable on the ball his first touch was good, and was unlucky not to score. McLeish says he is more of a signing for the future but I hope he plays some part this season.
did goc feature much today? If so how did he do? Im hoping he will prove a lot of doubters wrong this season - also I have heard that murphy is like a new player and has looked fit and good going forward in pre season?
GOC was ok did some decent stuff first half was subbed after the break, Murphy for me isn't good enough on the ball, played to many hoof balls when he came on and was well out pf position for their goal, although to be fair he has been out a long time.
|
|
|
| |
|
Raters
|
Aug 7 2010, 05:10 PM
Post #196
|
- Posts:
- 7,627
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #9,114
- Joined:
- November 6, 2007
|
- bcfc--4--life
- Aug 7 2010, 06:08 PM
i thought jeromes ball control was good today - i only saw the 2nd half though
His overall game was better in the second half, I was mearly nit picking
|
|
|
| |
|
pooley
|
Aug 7 2010, 05:10 PM
Post #197
|
- Posts:
- 18,433
- Group:
- Admin
- Member
- #11,489
- Joined:
- July 1, 2008
|
- Raters
- Aug 7 2010, 05:07 PM
- pooley
- Aug 7 2010, 06:02 PM
- Raters
- Aug 7 2010, 04:55 PM
- pooley
- Aug 7 2010, 05:54 PM
- OllieBCFC
- Aug 7 2010, 04:46 PM
Thought we played well today, result is irrelavent, win would've been a bonus but its all about fitness and allowing the manager to look at players, formations etc. For a game against very decent Spanish opposition I thought we kept the ball from them really well at times and we were extremely unlucky not to get at least one goal. Out of the new boys, Foster did well, didn't really have a chance with the goal, he made a few good saves and his catching of crosses and distribution was good. When Zigic came on we looked more of a threat up front and just his mere presence caused problems for their defence, his workrate also impressed me. I thought Valles was brilliant when he came on, looked so comfortable on the ball his first touch was good, and was unlucky not to score. McLeish says he is more of a signing for the future but I hope he plays some part this season.
did goc feature much today? If so how did he do? Im hoping he will prove a lot of doubters wrong this season - also I have heard that murphy is like a new player and has looked fit and good going forward in pre season?
Both played well mate. GOC looked strong, composed and his work rate was good. Murphy much the same. Both only played, at most, half the game. Seems to me we had subs every 5 mins lol
I didnt go to the game but seems to be the same people who critisised almost every aspect of the game. The way you approach, look at and evaluate a pre season gamwe is completley different to a competative game and like I say I didnt watch the game but I think some comments were too harsh in their content. The critisism of fahey is taking the michael now it seems, since sheffers left he seems to be our new scapegoat
TBH mate i could nit pick and it would be exactly that. e.g. Jeromes first touch and footie brain, still the same, but he made up for it in other ways. Overall I came away thinking we gave them a good run, in fact we were unlucky. A good solid performance over all. Particularly when you realise we had practically the whole team subbed! BTW Fahey had a good game!
I get a bit cynical about 'fahey doubters' as a few are people who dont seem to remember or seem to have seen what he did season before last like when he had a blinder v forest at home, his goal against reading...
|
|
|
| |
|
Raters
|
Aug 7 2010, 05:12 PM
Post #198
|
- Posts:
- 7,627
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #9,114
- Joined:
- November 6, 2007
|
- pooley
- Aug 7 2010, 06:10 PM
I get a bit cynical about 'fahey doubters' as a few are people who dont seem to remember or seem to have seen what he did season before last like when he had a blinder v forest at home, his goal against reading...
With better players around him he WILL be better.
His football brain is beter than some of the others
|
|
|
| |
|
.Jake
|
Aug 7 2010, 05:12 PM
Post #199
|
- Posts:
- 7,583
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #10,001
- Joined:
- February 22, 2008
|
- pooley
- Aug 7 2010, 05:10 PM
- Raters
- Aug 7 2010, 05:07 PM
- pooley
- Aug 7 2010, 06:02 PM
- Raters
- Aug 7 2010, 04:55 PM
- pooley
- Aug 7 2010, 05:54 PM
- OllieBCFC
- Aug 7 2010, 04:46 PM
Thought we played well today, result is irrelavent, win would've been a bonus but its all about fitness and allowing the manager to look at players, formations etc. For a game against very decent Spanish opposition I thought we kept the ball from them really well at times and we were extremely unlucky not to get at least one goal. Out of the new boys, Foster did well, didn't really have a chance with the goal, he made a few good saves and his catching of crosses and distribution was good. When Zigic came on we looked more of a threat up front and just his mere presence caused problems for their defence, his workrate also impressed me. I thought Valles was brilliant when he came on, looked so comfortable on the ball his first touch was good, and was unlucky not to score. McLeish says he is more of a signing for the future but I hope he plays some part this season.
did goc feature much today? If so how did he do? Im hoping he will prove a lot of doubters wrong this season - also I have heard that murphy is like a new player and has looked fit and good going forward in pre season?
Both played well mate. GOC looked strong, composed and his work rate was good. Murphy much the same. Both only played, at most, half the game. Seems to me we had subs every 5 mins lol
I didnt go to the game but seems to be the same people who critisised almost every aspect of the game. The way you approach, look at and evaluate a pre season gamwe is completley different to a competative game and like I say I didnt watch the game but I think some comments were too harsh in their content. The critisism of fahey is taking the michael now it seems, since sheffers left he seems to be our new scapegoat
TBH mate i could nit pick and it would be exactly that. e.g. Jeromes first touch and footie brain, still the same, but he made up for it in other ways. Overall I came away thinking we gave them a good run, in fact we were unlucky. A good solid performance over all. Particularly when you realise we had practically the whole team subbed! BTW Fahey had a good game!
I get a bit cynical about 'fahey doubters' as a few are people who dont seem to remember or seem to have seen what he did season before last like when he had a blinder v forest at home, his goal against reading...
just searched that, cant remember see-ing it but thats world class ! :D
|
|
|
| |
|
poppa999
|
Aug 7 2010, 05:14 PM
Post #200
|
- Posts:
- 5,790
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #5,585
- Joined:
- August 8, 2006
|
Look shaky once Dann went (let's hope one or both of those CB isn't out this season), Ferguson good game and Michel looked steady. When Zigic and Phillips were on it looked like a Phillips/Niall Quinn were back from Sunderland! Real Mallorca scored with the first and only real (no pun intended) attempt of the second half. You're right about Jerome. If he could mend the first touch thing he would be a class act. To be fair I can't see why people get so passionate about Fahey, he's just a so so player, nothing special.
|
|
|
| |
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
|