Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to bcfcforum.co.uk. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Blues Money?; -work it out. It's fairly Easy
Topic Started: Aug 18 2011, 05:54 AM (528 Views)
midland red
Member Avatar
Mikael Forssell
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Every penny we raise, is going to pay and support every blues' employee.
Manager, Coaches,Admin, Tea Ladies, Groundstaff, Players etc
It ain't going anywhere else.



Blues anticipated a minimum £40 million income next season -
perhaps a £50-55million income. :o

We get £8million next week and £8 million in February

Montgomery and Mcleish pushed the Blues board to the 'next' level in finances and Yeung had to mortgage his properties to fund it.
(So much for an alleged "money-launderer"...he had to get a mortgage :LMAO: )

When Mcleish was staying at Blues, he authorised and approved the removal of Parnaby, Phillips, Bowyer, Hleb,Bentley,McFadden etc all the £35K a week and above players.
McLeish approved or initiated their removal.

That was hs job and that was in his contract.

But Pannu gets the blame

:LMAO:

Blues have lost an income of £40 million this season.

We get 2 lots of £8 million as a parachute payment.

Work it out!

The money from Johnson, gardner, fergosn is staggered. As normal.

We'll be lucky to see 25% of the total fees paid up front - considering where they've gone. :D But they were high earners, they are off our bill and we are closer maintaining a squad.

We are in desparate mire...YES !

Because of silly and over-priced player wages.

Naive Board ?.....YES, imo.

A Too Trusting Board - - imo.

....our board believed McLeish and Montgomery that hyper-wages for Hleb, Bentley Derbyshire etc would prove it's worth.
Montgomery was sacked! ....Not a minute too soon imo.
McLeish may have got a whisper of a free-agent job, and abandoned Blues...his lifelong coach as well.



I hope both Mcleish & Montgomery hype themselves up and get Moxley of the Mail to support them...at Villa. (e.g Villa scout discovered Drogba -Moxley EXCLUSIVE!!!!!)




Anyway.....Every penny we raise, is going to pay and support every blues' employee.
Manager, Coaches,Admin, Tea Ladies, Groundstaff, Players etc
It ain't going anywhere else
.


**thumbup
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Willie
Member Avatar
Willie
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
midland red
Aug 18 2011, 06:54 AM
Every penny we raise, is going to pay and support every blues' employee.
Manager, Coaches,Admin, Tea Ladies, Groundstaff, Players etc
It ain't going anywhere else.



Blues anticipated a minimum £40 million income next season -
perhaps a £50-55million income. :o

We get £8million next week and £8 million in February

Montgomery and Mcleish pushed the Blues board to the 'next' level in finances and Yeung had to mortgage his properties to fund it.
(So much for an alleged  "money-launderer"...he had to get a mortgage  :LMAO: )

When Mcleish was staying at Blues, he authorised and approved the removal of Parnaby, Phillips, Bowyer, Hleb,Bentley,McFadden etc all the £35K a week and above players.
McLeish approved or initiated their removal.

That was hs job and that was in his contract.

But Pannu gets the blame

:LMAO:

Blues have lost an income of £40 million this season.

We get 2 lots of £8 million as a parachute payment.

Work it out!

The money from Johnson, gardner, fergosn is staggered. As normal.

We'll be lucky to see 25% of the total fees paid up front - considering where they've gone.  :D  But they were high earners, they are off our bill and we are closer maintaining a squad.

We are in desparate mire...YES !

Because of silly and over-priced player wages.

Naive Board ?.....YES, imo.

A Too Trusting Board - - imo.

....our board believed McLeish and Montgomery that hyper-wages for Hleb, Bentley Derbyshire etc would prove it's worth.
Montgomery was sacked! ....Not a minute too soon imo.
McLeish may have got a whisper of a free-agent job,  and abandoned Blues...his lifelong coach as well.



I hope both Mcleish & Montgomery  hype themselves up and get Moxley of the Mail to support them...at Villa. (e.g Villa scout discovered Drogba  -Moxley EXCLUSIVE!!!!!)




Anyway.....Every penny we raise, is going to pay and support every blues' employee.
Manager, Coaches,Admin, Tea Ladies, Groundstaff, Players etc
It ain't going anywhere else
.


**thumbup

Midland, if you take the time to go back and look at any article involving transfers you will usually see the comment from Mr Pannu that the board is working with Alex,Chris
on new players.

Now you say McLiesh authorised the removal of the likes of

Parnaby, Phillips, Bowyer, Hleb,Bentley,McFadden etc all the £35K a week and above players.

Hleb and Bentley were on loan so were always going back.

As for the rest let me ask you a question Why was Gardner sold, why is Foster on loan at Westbrom.....

what is the difference between what McLiesh did and what Mr Pannu is doing ??

Quote:
 
The money from Johnson, gardner, fergosn is staggered. As normal./QUOTE]

I think you will find that the fees for all three have been paid in full.
Blues got approx £4m for johnson and Gardner cash, and £500K For Ferguson cash

You say the board are Naive.

And too trusting.

A lot of the blame for the mess this club is in has to fall on the financial executive's shoulders. after all that person approved all these deals based on the knowledge they have of the clubs finances.

Now who is the financial exec at blues.....................
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
morrisonisclass
Geoff Horsfield
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
I don't think you can say either way whether the fees for those players were staggered or paid up front. I don't think anyone on here second guessing can really?

At the end of the day we are struggling financially but not in ruins, and we need a few players in then we can be right up there.

Eck shouldn't have taken us down , mistakes were made, now he's gone let's get on with it and see what CH can do for us.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Des
Malcom Page
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
WELL SAID MORRISON! but it is quite common knowledge that we have taken les than market rate for Gardner Johnson Foster etsc because we needed money up front.
KRO
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Papaulski
Member Avatar
Paul Tait
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Des
Aug 18 2011, 11:45 AM
WELL SAID MORRISON! but it is quite common knowledge that we have taken les than market rate for Gardner Johnson Foster etsc because we needed money up front.
KRO

But were getting mixed message some say we got £4million for Johnson and then Tatts says £7million alot of others agree. Fact is we don't know and people will pick the price they like best depending if they are for or against the board. I'd be very surprised if we accepted £4million but I guess we'll never know. KRO!!!!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
bluenoseghag
Member Avatar
Geoff Horsfield
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Papaulski
Aug 18 2011, 01:50 PM
Des
Aug 18 2011, 11:45 AM
WELL SAID MORRISON!  but it is quite common knowledge that we have taken les than market rate for Gardner Johnson Foster etsc because we needed money up front.
KRO

But were getting mixed message some say we got £4million for Johnson and then Tatts says £7million alot of others agree. Fact is we don't know and people will pick the price they like best depending if they are for or against the board. I'd be very surprised if we accepted £4million but I guess we'll never know. KRO!!!!

Wolves offered £6m and we rejected it at first. I personally think we then realised that Wolves were the only interested party and then decided to accept at £6m
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Willie
Member Avatar
Willie
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
bluenoseghag
Aug 18 2011, 02:16 PM
Papaulski
Aug 18 2011, 01:50 PM
Des
Aug 18 2011, 11:45 AM
WELL SAID MORRISON!  but it is quite common knowledge that we have taken les than market rate for Gardner Johnson Foster etsc because we needed money up front.
KRO

But were getting mixed message some say we got £4million for Johnson and then Tatts says £7million alot of others agree. Fact is we don't know and people will pick the price they like best depending if they are for or against the board. I'd be very surprised if we accepted £4million but I guess we'll never know. KRO!!!!

Wolves offered £6m and we rejected it at first. I personally think we then realised that Wolves were the only interested party and then decided to accept at £6m

I think you will find it was around £4m as Wolves paid the fee straight away and there is no sell on clause.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Blues Chat · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Forum Design by Hirsty.