Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to bcfcforum.co.uk. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Scott Dann; transfer fee
Topic Started: Dec 13 2011, 11:10 PM (796 Views)
tim
Member Avatar
Malcom Page
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
With Blackburn in apparent financial trouble and assuming they would still owe blues installments on the Dann transfer.. what would happen if they could not pay an installment?

Would we get him back lol or would we just be able to force a sale to get our cash?

Just wondered if there were any precedents?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
TJDIXI
Member Avatar
Trevor Francis
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
tim
Dec 14 2011, 12:10 AM
With Blackburn in apparent financial trouble and assuming they would still owe blues installments on the Dann transfer.. what would happen if they could not pay an installment?

Would we get him back lol or would we just be able to force a sale to get our cash?

Just wondered if there were any precedents?

I believe that if the worst should come to the worst that football debts are protected in as much as they are paid first. Wholly unfair rules, but should the sky fall in any money owing to clubs would be paid first.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
lowdham bluenose
Joe Bradford
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
I thought Blues were getting "cash monies upfront" which is why our transfer fees were annoyingly and frustratingly low.

Yeung and Co needed cash, and still do.

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
The Yeung Pretenders
Member Avatar
Geoff Horsfield
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Yeah I thought all transfer fees we received this summer were cash up front rather than installments.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
V_For_Vendetta
Member Avatar
Paul Tait
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
lowdham bluenose
Dec 14 2011, 09:53 AM
I thought Blues were getting "cash monies upfront" which is why our transfer fees were annoyingly and frustratingly low.

Yeung and Co needed cash, and still do.

Absolutely.

I mean, who is going to pay for Carson Yeungs trial unless more players are sold?

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Raters
Bob Latchford
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
V_For_Vendetta
Dec 14 2011, 01:43 PM
lowdham bluenose
Dec 14 2011, 09:53 AM
I thought Blues were getting "cash monies upfront" which is why our transfer fees were annoyingly and frustratingly low.

Yeung and Co needed cash, and still do.

Absolutely.

I mean, who is going to pay for Carson Yeungs trial unless more players are sold?

He CAN NOT take money from the club :banghead:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
V_For_Vendetta
Member Avatar
Paul Tait
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Raters
Dec 14 2011, 03:19 PM
V_For_Vendetta
Dec 14 2011, 01:43 PM
lowdham bluenose
Dec 14 2011, 09:53 AM
I thought Blues were getting "cash monies upfront" which is why our transfer fees were annoyingly and frustratingly low.

Yeung and Co needed cash, and still do.

Absolutely.

I mean, who is going to pay for Carson Yeungs trial unless more players are sold?

He CAN NOT take money from the club :banghead:

Raters,

How would we know?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Raters
Bob Latchford
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
V_For_Vendetta
Dec 14 2011, 03:24 PM
Raters
Dec 14 2011, 03:19 PM
V_For_Vendetta
Dec 14 2011, 01:43 PM
lowdham bluenose
Dec 14 2011, 09:53 AM
I thought Blues were getting "cash monies upfront" which is why our transfer fees were annoyingly and frustratingly low.

Yeung and Co needed cash, and still do.

Absolutely.

I mean, who is going to pay for Carson Yeungs trial unless more players are sold?

He CAN NOT take money from the club :banghead:

Raters,

How would we know?

Sorry mate, but the clubs not owned by him. he's a share holder.

The club has to produce accounts to trade in the UK. He can not just take money out. How would the Majority share holders feel about that?

It just can't happen unless the accountants, the FD etc etc were all involved with the fraud.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
V_For_Vendetta
Member Avatar
Paul Tait
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Raters
Dec 14 2011, 03:26 PM
V_For_Vendetta
Dec 14 2011, 03:24 PM
Raters
Dec 14 2011, 03:19 PM
V_For_Vendetta
Dec 14 2011, 01:43 PM
lowdham bluenose
Dec 14 2011, 09:53 AM
I thought Blues were getting "cash monies upfront" which is why our transfer fees were annoyingly and frustratingly low.

Yeung and Co needed cash, and still do.

Absolutely.

I mean, who is going to pay for Carson Yeungs trial unless more players are sold?

He CAN NOT take money from the club :banghead:

Raters,

How would we know?

Sorry mate, but the clubs not owned by him. he's a share holder.

The club has to produce accounts to trade in the UK. He can not just take money out. How would the Majority share holders feel about that?

It just can't happen unless the accountants, the FD etc etc were all involved with the fraud.

Are there any shareholders at Blues who are not pals with Yeung? Surely all people involved financially at Blues have links to Yeung.

Considering BIH are supposedly potless, where did his six-figure bail money come from when his assets are all frozen?

Am I missing something?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
tim
Member Avatar
Malcom Page
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
lowdham bluenose
Dec 14 2011, 09:53 AM
I thought Blues were getting "cash monies upfront" which is why our transfer fees were annoyingly and frustratingly low.

Yeung and Co needed cash, and still do.

yeah maybe a bit naive of me there to think that we had done a deal like 99.9% of clubs :crying: and that the 'Firesale' probably meant we'd taken the cash in full up front. :crying:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
poppa999
Member Avatar
Mikael Forssell
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Well we can't be overdrawn at the bank, we know that much because there is no overdaft currently.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Blues Chat · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Forum Design by Hirsty.